rolex 216570 vs 16570 | Rolex explorer 226570 black review rolex 216570 vs 16570 Generally speaking, the newer ref. 216570 is bigger, bolder, and more aggressively designed than its classic older brother the ref. 16570. Depending on the example, the Explorer II 16570's . See more $50.00
0 · black Rolex explorer ii
1 · Rolex explorer ii size comparison
2 · Rolex explorer ii lug width
3 · Rolex explorer 226570 black review
4 · Rolex explorer 2 226570 review
5 · Rolex explorer 2 216570 review
6 · Rolex 226570 review
7 · 216570 Rolex review
$114.76
Regardless of the specific reference, there are a handful of design traits that are common throughout all Explorer II watches. First, Rolex has only ever made the Explorer II in stainless steel; there have never been two-tone or solid gold references. Second, all Rolex Explorer II models are equipped with a fixed . See more
Rolex released the Explorer II ref. 16570 in 1989 to replace the preceding ref. 16550. Like its predecessor, the Explorer II 16570 featured a 40mm steel case, sapphire crystal, thin red . See more
While both models include stainless steel Oyster cases and Oyster bracelets, the option of black or white dials, and dual time functionality, if we compare the specs of the Explorer II . See more
Generally speaking, the newer ref. 216570 is bigger, bolder, and more aggressively designed than its classic older brother the ref. 16570. Depending on the example, the Explorer II 16570's . See more
The Rolex Explorer II (Ref. 216570) and the new Rolex Explorer II (Ref. 226570) look almost identical, but in truth there are at least 15 differences between the two. Everest .
The bracelet is heavier thanks to solid SS links vs. the rolled links on the 16570 and I love the Easylink adjustment. Have to admit the 42mm size took some getting used to. My other Rolex in addition to my old 16570 is a 36mm DJ. After a couple of weeks, however the 216570 seemed the perfect size to me. Explorer II 16570 vs 216570 collectability I have an Explorer II 16570 in white that I am considering trading up for a black dial 216570. Other than the size and color differences, I was wondering about peoples thoughts on long term collectability. In the photo it seems you're comparing the 39mm Explorer vs the 40mm Explorer II. Big, big difference between that comparison and the 39mm Explorer vs the 42mm Explorer II. Good point. 114270 vs 216570 = 114270. 214270 vs 16570 = 16570. 214270 vs 216570 = neither. 114270 vs 16570 = impossible. Posts: 43,473. If you want those items in your watch, the only original choice is a 16570. If you were to find a 16550 so equipped, it would have service parts, which is fine with some of us, but not with purists. The cases are the same, the difference is in the 3085 vs the 3185 movement, and the later 16570's will have an SEL bracelet.
Posts: 952. Explorer II 216570 vs 226570. Its been a while since the release of 226570 and I have seen multiple of ppl already bought them through AD. I am owner of 216570 but looking at multiple sources comparing the two differences in detail, I still prefer the 216570. I like polish black hands better than matte black hands and other changes. Help! Explorer II 16570 vs 216570? Or... Rolex General Discussion. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion Many prefer the 226 over the 216, because the newer model has a wider bracelet, small and more refined lugs, and the smaller case. It seems like Rolex released the 226 to "correct" the issues of the 216. I own both the 16570 and the 216570 and intend to get the 226570 when (or if) my AD calls me.
Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum. Wednesday 23 October 2024 @ 10:34:28 am. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum. Message. User Name. Remember Me? Not saying you should buy both of course, but as much as love the 16710, the prices still are a bit tough to swallow, esp in comparison to the 16570. And this is also relevant to your query, since the 16570 is more discrete and the lower value watch, so maybe safer to travel with. The 16570 is a real gem. 14060 vs 16570 Rolex General . 14060 vs 16570. . However the new 216570 is a stunner and compliments . The bracelet is heavier thanks to solid SS links vs. the rolled links on the 16570 and I love the Easylink adjustment. Have to admit the 42mm size took some getting used to. My other Rolex in addition to my old 16570 is a 36mm DJ. After a couple of weeks, however the 216570 seemed the perfect size to me.
Explorer II 16570 vs 216570 collectability I have an Explorer II 16570 in white that I am considering trading up for a black dial 216570. Other than the size and color differences, I was wondering about peoples thoughts on long term collectability.
yves saint laurent lip gloss boots
In the photo it seems you're comparing the 39mm Explorer vs the 40mm Explorer II. Big, big difference between that comparison and the 39mm Explorer vs the 42mm Explorer II. Good point. 114270 vs 216570 = 114270. 214270 vs 16570 = 16570. 214270 vs 216570 = neither. 114270 vs 16570 = impossible.
Posts: 43,473. If you want those items in your watch, the only original choice is a 16570. If you were to find a 16550 so equipped, it would have service parts, which is fine with some of us, but not with purists. The cases are the same, the difference is in the 3085 vs the 3185 movement, and the later 16570's will have an SEL bracelet.Posts: 952. Explorer II 216570 vs 226570. Its been a while since the release of 226570 and I have seen multiple of ppl already bought them through AD. I am owner of 216570 but looking at multiple sources comparing the two differences in detail, I still prefer the 216570. I like polish black hands better than matte black hands and other changes.
black Rolex explorer ii
Help! Explorer II 16570 vs 216570? Or... Rolex General Discussion. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion Many prefer the 226 over the 216, because the newer model has a wider bracelet, small and more refined lugs, and the smaller case. It seems like Rolex released the 226 to "correct" the issues of the 216. I own both the 16570 and the 216570 and intend to get the 226570 when (or if) my AD calls me. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum. Wednesday 23 October 2024 @ 10:34:28 am. Rolex Forums - Rolex Watch Forum. Message. User Name. Remember Me?
Not saying you should buy both of course, but as much as love the 16710, the prices still are a bit tough to swallow, esp in comparison to the 16570. And this is also relevant to your query, since the 16570 is more discrete and the lower value watch, so maybe safer to travel with. The 16570 is a real gem.
Rolex explorer ii size comparison
Rolex explorer ii lug width
Our women's wide-leg pants are perfect for showing off in any setting — from your home office to city streets. Some have hidden tie cords in the legs so you can transform them from free and flowy to revved up and ruched in a snap.
rolex 216570 vs 16570|Rolex explorer 226570 black review
